资料下载专区 | |||
雅思考后回忆试题 | 雅思教师预测试题 | 雅思口语题库 | 雅思写作范文集 |
导语:小烤鸭们在雅思写作过程中,是不是经常会碰到没有思路的情况?小编给大家推荐《不可错过的雅思写作范文库》,涵盖2021年每月雅思考试试题及范文,每天看一篇,相信你一定会有所进步。更多雅思复习资料请点击进入雅思听力、雅思口语、雅思阅读、雅思写作等频道,新东方雅思考试网祝你考试顺利!
题目:
Health experts claim that walking is the best exercise. However, people are walking less on a daily basis. What has made it happen and how to deal with this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
范文:
Scientific researches indicate that walking, as a basic form of exercise, benefits people a great deal whereas few can achieve the required number of steps in their everyday lives. This phenomenon is basically due to transportation and recreational reasons and the individuals and government are both obliged to change this unhealthy situation.
The primary cause for less walkers is due to the technological breakthroughs. These developments of vehicles like subway and private cars allow city dwellers to commute for longer distances than ever, enabling them to live and work in far-off locations. However, it naturally excludes the option of commuting on foot as the mileage has already become beyond footage. What is more, thanks to the smartphone, the Internet and excellent computer games, screening time has occupied much greater amounts of leisure time, which dramatically reduced the time for outdoor activities for normal residents. Compared with the pastime after dinner in the past which was normally to take a walk with the family in my country, most family members these days usually intoxicate themselves in digital worlds immediately after household duties.
Mainly for the well-being of citizens, two suggestions can be adopted either by individual family or by government. The more efficient but relatively ideal solution to this worrying issue is to live near the school or workplace. Whenever the rent or the mortgage is affordable, the family should prefer the accommodation resulting in shorter daily routes which save time and promote the possibility of walking, or at least cycling. In the meantime, government should restrict the screen time for adolescents, publicize the idea of more walking like introducing pedometer and ranking in social apps, as well as exploit more attractions suitable for hiking and excursion.
To conclude, even though the convenient and fantastic tools have removed the option of sufficient daily walking and produced less pedestrians in urban streets, it is still a favourable choice for normal persons to walk more and the authorities should endeavour to facilitate the progress.